Information about the article

Title of the article

Problems of Qualification of Testimony as a Criminal Punished Act

 Authors 

Gennadiy I. Molev — Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law, Institute of Law, Penza State University, Candidate of law, Associate Professor, 40 Krasnaya Street, Penza, 440026, Russia, gmolev@mail.ru
Andrey I. Puzarin — Master student, Institute of Law, Penza State University, 40 Krasnaya Street, Penza, 440026, Russia, andrei.11.kent.11@mail.ru 

 Category 

CRIMINAL LAW, LAW ENFORCEMENT

Year,.Volume, Number 

2021, Vol. 9, № 1 (33)

 Pages 

102-108

 Article type 

Original article

 Index UDK 

34

 DOI 

10.21685/2307-9525-2021-9-1-13

 Abstract 

The article provides an overview of the legislation establishing criminal liability for torture in the Russian Federation. Scientific understanding of the problems of qualification of torture as a criminal offense is necessary for more effective criminal legal protection of the individual in the Russian Federation. Most of the provisions of the criminal law contain clear, from the point of view of qualification, compositions. At the same time, such a criminal offense as torture raises a number of questions in practice. This is primarily due to the fact that physical or mental suffering is quite difficult to establish and provable. The article considers some controversial issues of qualification of the analysed crime and makes proposals aimed at improving the legislation regulating social relations that arise in connection with the onset of criminal liability for torture.

 Keywords 

criminal law, criminal liability, torture, physical suffering, mental suffering



 Download PDF

References

1. Barysheva K. A. Criminal Law Protection of Private Life in Russia and Foreign Coun-tries. Zakon = Law, 2017, no. 12, pp. 151-162 (in Russian).
2. Korotkov A. V., Eremina N. V. Domestic Violence within the Limits of Responsibility for Beatings. Leningradskii iuridicheskii zhurnal = Leningrad Law Journal, 2017, no. 2, pp. 208-215 (in Russian).
3. Kudriavtsev V. L. Objective Side of Qualified Corpus Delicti – Coercion to Testify (Part 2 of art. Of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation): Theoretical and Practical Prob-lems. Advokat = Lawyer, 2016, no. 10, pp. 53-59 (in Russian).
4. Zebnitskaia A. K. Some Issues of the Legal Regulation of «Domestic (Family) Violence» in Russia and the USA. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdu-narodnaia iustitsiia = Inter-national Criminal Law and International Justice, 2020, no. 3, pp. 17-19.
5. Davydova N. N. The Principle of Respect for the Person’s Honor and Dignity in the Russian Criminal Proceedings. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2019, no. 9, pp. 22-25 (in Russian).
6. Kharlamov V. S. Criminal Law Interpretation of Victimization Aspect of Domestic Vio-lence. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2016, no. 4, pp. 108-118 (in Russian).
7. Bespalov Iu. F. Family Violence in the Russian Federation as a Defect in the Life and Activities of a Family and Its Members: a Sociolegal Aspect. Notarius = Notary, 2019, no. 1, pp. 21-25 (in Russian).
8. Shikula I. R. Relevant Issues of Criminal Law Protection of Rights and Freedoms of an Aggrieved in a Helpless Condition Due to Violence in the Family and Domestic Environment. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2020, no. 3, pp. 48-51 (in Russian).
9. Serdiuk L. V. On Protection of Children against Family Violence and the Problem of Legal Education Thereof. Voprosy iuvenal'noi iustitsii = Issues of Juvenile Justice, 2014, no. 3, pp. 16-19 (in Russian).
10. Popov D. V. The Similarities and Differences in Crimes of Violence against Family Members and Minors in the Criminal Laws of Russia and the Countries of the European Union. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaia iustitsiia = International Criminal Law and International Justice, 2018, no. 1, pp. 26-29 (in Russian).
11. Bruner R. A. Administrative Restraining Order in the Sphere of Counteraction to Family and Domestic Violence Revisited. Sovremennoe pravo = Modern Law, 2018, no. 7-8, pp. 34-35 (in Russian).
12. Shestopalova E. R. Features of the Legal Regulation of Women's Criminogenic Vic-timhood and Prevention of Family Violence. Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Adminis-trative and Municipal Law, 2012, no. 8, pp. 86-89 (in Russian).
13. Kuianova A. V. Prophylaxis of Domestic Family Conflicts, Domestic Violence and Prevention of Family Crimes. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure, 2015, no. 9, pp. 52-56 (in Russian).
14. Kaufman M. A. Mistakes in Criminal Law Legislation. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2016, no. 9, pp. 92-101 (in Russian).
15. Zharkikh E. A. Criminal and Administrative Legal Repeated Offense: Things in Common. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2016, no. 19, pp. 23-26 (in Russian).

For citation

Molev G.I., Puzarin A.I. Problems of Qualification of Testimony as a Criminal Punished Act. Electronic scientific journal «Science. Society. State», 2021, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 102-108, available at: http://esj.pnzgu.ru. DOI: 10.21685/2307-9525-2021-9-1-13. (In Russian).

 

Дата создания: 05.05.2022 00:37
Дата обновления: 09.05.2022 15:47